Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Bernard Tomic vs Elijah Poritzky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tomic vs Poritzky analysis and find out who is favored!
Bernard Tomic vs Elijah Poritzky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tomic 0 - 0 Poritzky
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tomic has won 50.84% of points on their second serve, while Poritzky has won 42.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tomic, in recent form, has won 53.41% of their opponent's second serve points, while Poritzky has won 61.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.36% and 28.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tomic has saved 64.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Poritzky has saved 62.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tomic has won 62.96% of matches played (W/L 51/ 30), with Poritzky winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tomic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 261/ 159), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 51/ 75). Poritzky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Tomic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.45% of matches (W/L 31/ 27), where as Poritzky has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 7/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tomic has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.02 while Poritzky has played against players with an average rank of 38.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tomic has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Poritzky has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tomic has converted 44.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Poritzky has converted 55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
245
Rank
17
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
56% (406-319)
Career Total W/L
43% (27-36)
66% (25-13)
YTD W/L
67% (6-3)
$3,883,920
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Bernard Tomic | Elijah Poritzky |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (25/13) | 67% (6/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (53/31) | 63% (12/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (437/371) | 57% (91/70) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (17/10) | 75% (3/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 60% (3/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 232 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 18 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:12 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 262.32 | 60 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1424/2435) | 67% (171/255) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (1057/1424) | 65% (111/171) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (514/1011) | 43% (36/84) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (96/214) | 55% (11/20) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (918/2383) | 41% (91/221) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (13/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 86% (12/2) | 67% (6/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (25/36) | 67% (6/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 69% (9/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (15/5) | 0% (3/0) |
Bernard Tomic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Bernard Tomic
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve %
52%
(
11 of
21)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
29
Total Points Won
11
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
47%
(
34 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
8
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Bernard Tomic
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
4)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
3
Total Points Won
1
|
w/o | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Axel Nefve
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
106)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
50 of
75)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Felix Corwin
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Jacob Brumm
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Bernard Tomic
55%
(
59 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
110)
8
Aces
17
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
110)
108
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Ernesto Escobedo
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
31 of
38)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
15 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Andre Ilagan
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
15
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Elijah Poritzky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sora Fukuda
Player
Elijah Poritzky
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elijah Poritzky
Player
Kento Tagashira
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
19 of
22)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
2 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Axel Nefve
Player
Elijah Poritzky
44%
(
18 of
41)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elijah Poritzky
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
2
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Tomic Vs Poritzky Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Tomic are available here and Poritzky photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
